On July 17-18, the fourth edition of the Computers, Privacy, and Data Protection Conference Latin America (CPDP LatAm) was held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. This year’s theme was on “Data Governance: From Latin America to the G20,” highlighting Brazil’s current presidency of the international cooperation forum. As in previous years, FPF participated on the ground – this year, FPF organized a panel on the adoption and deployment of privacy-enhancing technologies in the region. This blog will cover highlights from both the plenary sessions and FPF’s panel.
During the opening plenary session, panelists discussed the relevance of data governance for informational self-determination and the sustainable development of technology. The panel argued that data sovereignty and data governance should be central values in the development and regulation of technologies in a way that empowers both nations and individuals. Panelists cautioned that in recent years some technologies have been developed without data governance frameworks and limited accountability, leaving self-determination to individuals and without a sustainable development future. As a result, panelists agreed data governance is likely to remain a recurring theme in G20 debates, and regulators will play an increasingly critical role in monitoring the sustainable and ethical development of technology.
During the closing plenary session, panelists reminded the audience that approving laws and regulations is just the first step in the regulatory journey. For instance, while discussing Brazil’s AI Bill (PL 2338/2023), panelists commented that the proposal provides a strong framework to regulate and monitor the deployment of AI technologies. Regardless of potential amendments to the current proposal, regulators must be aware that active implementation is the most relevant aspect of the regulatory journey.
On a separate note, panelists also discussed data governance as an essential component of digital public infrastructures (DPIs)1. For instance, they noted DPIs became relevant after India included them as a priority during its G20 presidency. Although digital public infrastructure is still an evolving concept, it can be explored as an alternative to develop and deploy technology, while keeping a critical approach and understanding the normative values embedded in this concept. The introduction of this concept offers a reminder that other jurisdictions and regions, including Latin America, can benefit from the knowledge and experience shared by other regions like the Asia-Pacific. At the same time, panelists agreed that these references should not prevent policymakers in Latin America from thinking, analyzing, and deciding standards and mechanisms for data governance in consideration of the region’s unique social, economic, and cultural dynamics.
FPF’s Panel: Exploring the Potential of PETs in Latin America
FPF’s panel focused on the potential of privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) to advance privacy and data protection in Latin America. During the discussion, the goal was to cover three main points: i) the state of deployment of some of these technologies; ii) policymaking and regulatory priorities; and iii) opportunities and potential limitations.
First, panelists discussed the growing popularity of PETs in recent years as a result of progress in research and computational capacity. Global policy efforts for the adoption of PETs have included the release of guidance, the creation of sandboxes, and increased investment in PETs research and development. Latin America has not been the exception, as regulators have begun to discuss the potential of PETs to help mitigate privacy risks and reduce the identifiability of data.
For instance, Brazil’s Autoridade Nacional de Proteção de Dados (ANPD) recently conducted technical studies on anonymization and pseudonymization as a basis for its forthcoming guidance. The ANPD also acted as an observer of OpenLoop, Meta’s global initiative connecting policymakers and companies to develop policies around emerging technologies and AI, a project developed separately in Brazil and Uruguay. One of the project’s findings in Brazil identifies a gap in most data protection laws (including the LGPD): a lack of an express provision covering PETs. In some cases, the connection between the law and these technologies relies on achieving data protection principles such as data minimization or complying with anonymization obligations. Panelists agreed that the need to define clear standards for anonymization is an important step for PETs adoption.
[Photo description: Pedro Sydenstricker (Nym Technologies, Brazil); Pedro Martins (Data Privacy Brasil); Maria Badillo (FPF); Thiago Moraes (ANPD); Camila Nagano (iFood)]
Relatedly, panelists discussed use cases where PETs can help with business development while preserving the privacy and utility of the data. For instance, in the food delivery service industry, panelists discussed how different techniques help obscure or eliminate personal data retrieved from customer interactions. If properly implemented, businesses can keep relevant data for analysis and improvement of services while preserving the privacy of their customers. Panelists agreed that organizations investing time and resources to integrate these types of tools not only open up new opportunities to improve user engagement and drive strategic decision-making, but also build trust, an essential component in digital transactions.
Finally, panelists briefly addressed the relevance of PETs in addressing privacy risks generated by AI. Acknowledging that AI can bring new ethical and legal challenges, they agreed on the importance of exploring the potential of different tools and techniques when adopting or developing AI models. Panelists agreed that organizations should make efforts to approve internal governance programs and guidance, invest in education and training for staff, and keep track of regulation. This, however, must be complemented with more legal certainty and guidance from regulators on how to implement PETs and AI governance more generally.
To foster dialogue and collaboration around PETs and policymaking, FPF supports the Global PETs Network for Regulators, a forum that exclusively convenes regulators worldwide. If you are interested in participating in the Network, please reach out to mbadillo@fpf.org or bmarcu@fpf.org. You can also learn more about FPF’s PETs-related work here.
- According to the United Nations Development Programme, there is growing consensus on defining DPIs as “a combination of (i) networked open technology standards built for public interest, (ii) enabling governance, and (iii) a community of innovative and competitive market players working to drive innovation, especially across public programmes.” Digital public infrastructure | United Nations Development Programme (visited July, 2024).
![↩]()
︎
︎